<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Indie Update &#187; Label Bashing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indieupdate.com/category/label-bashing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indieupdate.com</link>
	<description>Indie Music Blog - Independent Music News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:13:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>What They Don&#8217;t Want You To Know &#8211; Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/what-they-dont-want-you-to-know-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/what-they-dont-want-you-to-know-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brooke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Label Bashing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/what-they-dont-want-you-to-know-part-1/2006/11/19/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have probably all heard it before.  In order to make it as a musician, you have to be in New York or LA, you have to sign a record deal, and you have to submit to a specific style of music with your clothes half off.
As an Indie Artist, you probably already know that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have probably all heard it before.  In order to make it as a musician, you have to be in New York or LA, you have to sign a record deal, and you have to submit to a specific style of music with your clothes half off.</p>
<p>As an Indie Artist, you probably already know that this is not even close to true!  In fact, research says exactly the opposite.</p>
<p>The first thing to begin to understand, is that you don&#8217;t have to be in any particular place in order to make it as a big time artist.  Research is pointing to the opposite.  Even the record companies and large entertainment industries are doing everything outside of New York and LA because it is too expensive.  They are going to places like Atlanta, Miami, even over seas to find the next greatest.  It&#8217;s cheaper and there isn&#8217;t as much competition.</p>
<p>The 21st century, from economics to social abilities is decentralized.  Between technology and abilities to travel, there is no need to be in a specific place.  So, save your rent money and stay where you are!  New York and LA is an overrated destination for any type of artist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/what-they-dont-want-you-to-know-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Power of Indie</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/the-power-of-indie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/the-power-of-indie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brooke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Label Bashing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/the-power-of-indie/2006/10/14/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s a plague in indie music land that is under disguise. Indie nation is suffering from a fall in the ranks which hurts the very concept of “independence”. It’s the selling out of indie artist for faulty record contracts, hype and the surrendering of artistic value.
Many Indie artists think that to make it, you have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s a plague in indie music land that is under disguise. Indie nation is suffering from a fall in the ranks which hurts the very concept of “independence”. It’s the selling out of indie artist for faulty record contracts, hype and the surrendering of artistic value.</p>
<p>Many Indie artists think that to make it, you have to align yourself with a major record company. This is false. Even way back in the 50’s, your most powerful entity were independent labels which had a wealth of local talent to choose from and record. This is how Stax Records and Motown Records were created…through the spirit of independence. These labels started crashing when they aligned themselves with corporate entities. Sun Records and Sam Phillips, who was responsible for breaking in Elvis, Johnny Cash and others, started out as an indie label. Stax is the greatest example of powerful independent music label and operation that made a worldwide impact until the President started mingling with corporate distributors. I would advise any independent artist to read a copy of Rob Bowman’s book on Stax Records to see how an indie movement was undermined by the corporate big wigs.</p>
<p>There is now a chance for the Indie movement to come back like it did with Indie labels from the ‘50s.  With the knowledge, technology and possibilities that are now available, the Indie movement has the possibility to overcome major corporations and bring true music back to the stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/the-power-of-indie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do You Really Need Taxi?</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/do-you-really-need-taxi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/do-you-really-need-taxi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brooke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Label Bashing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/do-you-really-need-taxi/2006/10/13/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many indie musicians are looking for that big break, that recording contract or someone to verify their sound. Many artists have stars in their eyes, looking for the one company that will bless them and give them the green light for their material.
This brings into mind the web portal of Taxi.
Taxi is a web portal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many indie musicians are looking for that big break, that recording contract or someone to verify their sound. Many artists have stars in their eyes, looking for the one company that will bless them and give them the green light for their material.</p>
<p>This brings into mind the web portal of Taxi.</p>
<p>Taxi is a web portal that declares that it assists individual artists to get record deals, tips on songwriting and publishing. It has a wealth of resources, a musician’s database for collaboration and seminars that musicians can go to and meet with industry executives.</p>
<p>Some of the activities that Taxi has are commendable but at times, they seem to come across as a representative or an extended arm of the major record companies.</p>
<p>Do you really need Taxi to tell you whether you’re good or not? Shouldn’t your fan based determine whether they approve of your music or not? Taxi makes decisions based on <em>business models</em> that are traditional and right now, the business model is to sound like someone else. The music industry is a very cookie cutter industry to begin with and the statistics don’t lie.</p>
<p>Contrary to Taxi telling you that you can be the next hit maker, music industry sales over the past six years have dropped 20%. Why? It’s because of the lack of originality and everyone wanting to sound like someone else.</p>
<p>So if this is the case, what is Taxi really trying to do for you and tell you?</p>
<p>If you make music from the heart, someone is going to listen. Indie artist need to set up their own business models and not be dictated or influenced by representatives that really have the major labels best interest at heart.</p>
<p>Taxi has some good resources, but you don’t need their approval to do music or have an established career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/do-you-really-need-taxi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If You Really Want To Sign A Record Deal&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/if-you-really-want-to-sign-a-record-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/if-you-really-want-to-sign-a-record-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brooke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Label Bashing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/if-you-really-want-to-sign-a-record-deal/2006/10/09/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe you are at the point in your musical career where things are just getting a little too difficult.  You dream of days when you will be able to play your music the way that you want to on the stage.  However, there is the problem of getting to be known as an artist.  Wouldn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you are at the point in your musical career where things are just getting a little too difficult.  You dream of days when you will be able to play your music the way that you want to on the stage.  However, there is the problem of getting to be known as an artist.  Wouldn&#8217;t it be better to just sign a record deal?</p>
<p>Before you even think of signing on the dotted line, consider what you will really be getting into. </p>
<p>The rule of the &#8216;big four&#8217; when signing a record deal is that the only thing you will make is royalties as the artist.  That means that the millions of dollars you may accumulate&#8230;.go to everyone else first. </p>
<p>Not only that, but if you don&#8217;t sell, it means that you are in debt to the record company.  You owe them for the recording time, songs they arranged, and all of the little details that go into making a song and marketing it. </p>
<p>The recording industry, when looked at from a national level, is a business.  It is about cash flow going into everyone&#8217;s pockets, from the top of the hierarchy to the bottom.  As an artist, you will be the bottom. </p>
<p>So, when the going gets tough as an Indie artist, remember that if you had decided to sign that record deal, things would be much worse. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/if-you-really-want-to-sign-a-record-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unclear Channel</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/unclear-channel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/unclear-channel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brooke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Label Bashing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/unclear-channel/2006/09/29/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a time when radio stations were community owned. Your local D.J. made the programming choices and most local bands got their foot in the door by getting A and B side rotation on the local radio station.
Those were the good old days. Today, in 2006, the ballgame is different.
Former President Clinton signed the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a time when radio stations were community owned. Your local D.J. made the programming choices and most local bands got their foot in the door by getting A and B side rotation on the local radio station.</p>
<p>Those were the good old days. Today, in 2006, the ballgame is different.</p>
<p>Former President Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which was basically the death blow to community radio stations. Corporate moguls, Clear Channel, started buying up mom and pop stations, upgraded the equipment and then, started dictating the play lists and the artists to be played. This left the local artist out in the cold.</p>
<p>In the old days, the local D.J. was the program manager. For these big corporate conglomerates, your program manager may be 300 miles away in another town. These big wigs don’t know your community and the communities listening style.</p>
<p>Radio was created to serve the community at large. Corporations have made much mint off of stripping communities of its sound that defined them. Can you imagine if this would have happened to the local radio scenes in Detroit, Memphis and Trenton N.J in the 60’s?</p>
<p>As an indie artist, there is still a way to get to your audience. Many cities still have thriving community radio scenes that play great indie music. You can find these stations on the internet by Googling “Community Radio Stations”.</p>
<p>Even though the corporate big wigs think that they are getting over, the community radio scene is going to come back through the Internet and alternate routes to getting heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/unclear-channel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the Master Own You??</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/does-the-master-own-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/does-the-master-own-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brooke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Label Bashing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/does-the-master-own-you/2006/09/28/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes Sir Boss! I was willing to do anything to get famous and get off this merry-go-round of being an unknown artist. I just signed my first record contract and we go into the studio with a by the numbers producer. I don’t even know his name!
Yeah partner! The record company said that they would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Sir Boss! I was willing to do anything to get famous and get off this merry-go-round of being an unknown artist. I just signed my first record contract and we go into the studio with a by the numbers producer. I don’t even know his name!</p>
<p>Yeah partner! The record company said that they would take my masters and keep them for me! That is so sweet of them. They just know that we’re going to be the next hot band in America! They even advanced us 50,000 dollars to do the album, video, pay the producer and pay for a swanky spot in Beverly Hills while we record this!</p>
<p>Our agent is brilliant! He told the publishing company that we signed with that we don’t need a revision clause as far as publishing with them. It’s an 80-20 deal and that’s peanuts because we’re going to sell millions and millions of records! The record company is setting us up right now. We’ll be bigger than the other bands that came before us!</p>
<p>We owe them a CD every 8 months and if the previous one doesn’t sell, then they would take the profits from the second CD and put it towards the balance due for the first one not selling! Gee, this is great business practice.</p>
<p>I’ll let my manager and agent handle all the business stuff! I don’t have time for all of that. I’ve got songs to write and girls that will scream over me! Sometimes, I feel like I’m in jail, but at least the jail has a nice bed and is air conditioned.</p>
<p>As an indie artist, you need to master your career and be the master of your destiny.</p>
<p>As you are chasing your record deal, stop and think. Will you control the Master or will the Master control you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/does-the-master-own-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recoupable Expenses</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/recoupable-expenses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/recoupable-expenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 01:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>InBlaze</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Label Bashing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/recoupable-expenses/2006/08/18/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are several big temptations when a representative from a major label comes knocking on the door of an indie band. One of the biggest is, of course, the chance to get the music out to a much broader audience than indie status could ever hope to achieve. The other is money.
Signing with a big [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">There are several big temptations when a representative from a major label comes knocking on the door of an indie band. One of the biggest is, of course, the chance to get the music out to a much broader audience than indie status could ever hope to achieve. The other is money.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Signing with a big label may seem like the key to riches, but in fact it may actually leave a band in a deeper financial hole than when they started out. To begin with, although big labels try to offer increased promotion to the acts they sign due to the clout gained by merger after merger and a general lack of diversity in terms of ownership in the radio market, the fact remains that most albums signed produced by a major label fail to generate any revenue.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So, if you are among the acts who does not make money for a big label, well at least you gave it a shot. No harm done, right? Wrong. You may not have sold your soul to get that deal, but big labels are all about a sneaky little thing called recoupable expenses. That&rsquo;s right; in the end, all of the production, the touring support, the marketing are going to come out of the artists&rsquo; pocket anyway. If you happen to be in the greater percentage of artists who do not sell a ton of records, your debt will carry over to the next album.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Indie artists need to be very careful when the shark is circling in the water. The benefits of signing with a major label are generally not worth the risks. Remember, all of the &ldquo;big&rdquo; artists you hear about are success stories of the labels: those who end up indebted are never heard from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/recoupable-expenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Labels Shaft Musicians &#8211; 2. The Hidden Costs</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/how-labels-shaft-musicians-2-the-hidden-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/how-labels-shaft-musicians-2-the-hidden-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 20:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>InBlaze</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Label Bashing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are an alarming number of ways that record labels manage to bleed extra money from their clients. In a lot of cases these are charges that you and I would generally believe to be acceptable costs that the label themselves should pay. A prime example is &#34;secretly&#34; paying independent promoters to promote the single [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2">There are an alarming number of ways that record labels manage to bleed extra money from their clients. In a lot of cases these are charges that you and I would generally believe to be acceptable costs that the label themselves should pay.</font> <font size="2">A prime example is &quot;secretly&quot; paying independent promoters to promote the single or album. They usually do this by paying radio stations to play the music. Record labels claim to do this in order that the radio stations don&#8217;t know they&#8217;re being paid by the label. You might believe this would fall under the remit of the label, as being part of the marketing costs. However, in many contracts, deep down in the incredibly small print, you will usually find that the label would rather the band paid for it. Once the contract is signed, of course, there is nothing that can be done.</font> <font size="2">The most difficult part of this for musicians to bear is that the independent promoter is not as affordable as his name would suggest. The cost of this little transaction can easily be in the range of $500,000 or possibly even more. There is no guarantee that the independent promoter has a positive effect or that it is even they who get the record played on the radio. The band also has no say in whether it goes ahead or not.</font> <font size="2">The ist on signing a contract with a large label then do read every last letter of the fine print. If possible get a solicitor to look it over to be sure that you aren&#8217;t signing away your unborn children.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/how-labels-shaft-musicians-2-the-hidden-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Labels Shaft Musicians &#8211; 1. Selling Your Soul</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/how-labels-shaft-musicians-1-selling-your-soul/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/how-labels-shaft-musicians-1-selling-your-soul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>InBlaze</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Label Bashing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are actually several points neatly rolled into one post here but they&#8217;re all essentially based around the initial signing of that elusive first contract and even slightly before that.When a label A&#38;R guy turns up to a gig and likes what he hears he generally brings the equivalent of a pre-contract agreement with him. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2">There are actually several points neatly rolled into one post here but they&#8217;re all essentially based around the initial signing of that elusive first contract and even slightly before that.</font><font size="2">When a label A&amp;R guy turns up to a gig and likes what he hears he generally brings the equivalent of a pre-contract agreement with him. He tells the band that this agreement enables him to speak to the label about them and vice versa. All is not at it seems, even at this early stage. Most unsigned bands, though, would jump through hoops at this point and understandably sign the agreement. This pre-contract agreement in actual fact ties the band or musician to that particular label. It prevents them from contacting any other label or signing any agreements with another label. Essentially, unless the band agrees to the deal offered by the music label, they are left with no deal and no possibility of signing another deal. Eventually, the band will sign whatever the label has to offer. Usually this is a long contract requiring the band to commit to at least 5 albums and numerous videos. Obviously, if the first album is successful they&#8217;re still stuck with the same deal despite being a much more marketable prospect. What makes this worse is that while the band have essentially no way of getting out of the contract without being sued by the label, the reverse is not true. The label essentially have the right to cancel the agreement whenever they choose. Slow album sales or poor progress on an album will often see the label cancel their agreement. Bearing in mind how soon this occurs in the relationship between label and musician the early signs are not good.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/how-labels-shaft-musicians-1-selling-your-soul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Major Labels Suck &#8211; Volume 1</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/why-major-labels-suck-volume-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/why-major-labels-suck-volume-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 16:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>InBlaze</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Label Bashing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, let me explain why this is titled version 1. The logic is simple. There will undoubtedly be a lot of these posts because there are an almost insurmountable number of reasons why major labels suck. I&#8217;ll try my best not to simply state that they con artists out of money, although in many cases [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2">First, let me explain why this is titled version 1. The logic is simple. There will undoubtedly be a lot of these posts because there are an almost insurmountable number of reasons why <tag></tag>major labels suck. I&rsquo;ll try my best not to simply state that they con artists out of money, although in many cases they do, and give a more rounded opinion. So, in volume 1 we&rsquo;re going to briefly discuss how major labels con artists out of money when they offer digital downloads to consumers. Weird Al Yankovic pointed out that he makes considerably less (although, still considerably more than most I would imagine) money when his singles or albums sell as digital downloads. He points out that while it costs the labels and producers considerably less money to offer a song for download than to produce it on CD the artist sees less money. This despite, in the case of iTunes, an album only costing the consumer a couple of dollars less. <a title="The Digital Music Weblog" href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/06/14/weird-al-yankovic-says-digital-is-a-raw-deal-for-some-artists/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/06/14/weird-al-yankovic-says-digital-is-a-raw-deal-for-some-artists/?referer=');">Thedigitalmusicweblog</a> rather conveniently did some math to save every one else the effort so thanks for that. I&rsquo;ll cut a somewhat long mathematical story short here. Not only does the post point out that Weird Al (like so many other artists) only receives 4% of the sales from his digital music but also that he would be earning, on average, $45 for every thousand songs sold. That&rsquo;s 4.5 cents per song; when you consider that albums from Weird Al sell on iTunes for around $12 each that&rsquo;s ludicrous. In contrast, a $15 CD would line Weird Al&rsquo;s pockets with about 31 cents per song. Obviously, the morale of this story to most of us is not that we should buy the CD to make artists more money but something else. Artists on the books of major record labels get shafted whether their music sells digitally or on CD. Keep your eyes peeled for volume 2, which is sure to be with you sooner than you think. </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indieupdate.com/label-bashing/why-major-labels-suck-volume-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
