<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mixposure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indieupdate.com/indie-music/reviews/mixposure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/indie-music/reviews/mixposure/</link>
	<description>Indie Music Blog - Independent Music News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 05:22:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/indie-music/reviews/mixposure/comment-page-1/#comment-32798</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/?p=888#comment-32798</guid>
		<description>I was at the first Mixposure before it was hacked. Yes, it was a great site and the owner/creator ahd a great sense of humour, but he was absent a lot when he was needed to keep things in order.

I was also at the new Mixposure when was just a guitarists hangout, before it became an OMD site which it was before it took over the Mixposure name. I know the owner thought long and hard about buying the Mixposure name having started to build the site under it&#039;s previous name (don&#039;t know about the airhead others are talking about, to be honest I don&#039;t spend much time at the site!) and there were negative associations with the name as well as positive, mainly due to disruptive elements in the forums....

I think it&#039;s a bit much to say he hijacked the name - the original owner should have renewed, but for his own reasons didn&#039;t so the site was fair game, after all, you usually get at least 90 days advance reminder notice.

It&#039;s a completely different site but with obvious similarities in that they are/were both OMD sites and share a lot of the same musicians.

As Markyone says, if it works for you, go there, if it doesn&#039;t don&#039;t. What&#039;s between the owners of the respective sites is for them to deal with and no-one else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at the first Mixposure before it was hacked. Yes, it was a great site and the owner/creator ahd a great sense of humour, but he was absent a lot when he was needed to keep things in order.</p>
<p>I was also at the new Mixposure when was just a guitarists hangout, before it became an OMD site which it was before it took over the Mixposure name. I know the owner thought long and hard about buying the Mixposure name having started to build the site under it&#8217;s previous name (don&#8217;t know about the airhead others are talking about, to be honest I don&#8217;t spend much time at the site!) and there were negative associations with the name as well as positive, mainly due to disruptive elements in the forums&#8230;.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a bit much to say he hijacked the name &#8211; the original owner should have renewed, but for his own reasons didn&#8217;t so the site was fair game, after all, you usually get at least 90 days advance reminder notice.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a completely different site but with obvious similarities in that they are/were both OMD sites and share a lot of the same musicians.</p>
<p>As Markyone says, if it works for you, go there, if it doesn&#8217;t don&#8217;t. What&#8217;s between the owners of the respective sites is for them to deal with and no-one else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markyone</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/indie-music/reviews/mixposure/comment-page-1/#comment-32718</link>
		<dc:creator>Markyone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/?p=888#comment-32718</guid>
		<description>I joined the new mixposure site, before I ever heard  there had been a previous site. As I understand it, the domain name was purchased via a domain name provider, only after extensive attempts were made to contact the original owner of the domain name to acquire the rights to use it. The current admins and moderators of the new site were members of the old site.

What happened to the old mix is not known to me so i can only say what i know about the new one. It&#039;s a busy and active online community which is growing steadily. Members are always welcomed and you can jbe as active or passive as you wish. All artists are given free space to place music of any genre.

It&#039;s worked ok for me, so pay it a visit and see what happens, if it don&#039;t work for you then no problems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I joined the new mixposure site, before I ever heard  there had been a previous site. As I understand it, the domain name was purchased via a domain name provider, only after extensive attempts were made to contact the original owner of the domain name to acquire the rights to use it. The current admins and moderators of the new site were members of the old site.</p>
<p>What happened to the old mix is not known to me so i can only say what i know about the new one. It&#8217;s a busy and active online community which is growing steadily. Members are always welcomed and you can jbe as active or passive as you wish. All artists are given free space to place music of any genre.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worked ok for me, so pay it a visit and see what happens, if it don&#8217;t work for you then no problems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockmusiclover</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/indie-music/reviews/mixposure/comment-page-1/#comment-32353</link>
		<dc:creator>rockmusiclover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/?p=888#comment-32353</guid>
		<description>Why do my comments never show up on here?? 
The new Mixposure is bad. Terrible experiences with one of the owners/admins. To say she&#039;s an airhead is putting it kindly. Additionally, she trolls another web forum all day long whining about how bad she has it in her Texas mcmansion and spreads slander about the state. Don&#039;t expect good customer service with Mixposure. You&#039;ll be wasting your time with this site. Go elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do my comments never show up on here??<br />
The new Mixposure is bad. Terrible experiences with one of the owners/admins. To say she&#8217;s an airhead is putting it kindly. Additionally, she trolls another web forum all day long whining about how bad she has it in her Texas mcmansion and spreads slander about the state. Don&#8217;t expect good customer service with Mixposure. You&#8217;ll be wasting your time with this site. Go elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: musiclover</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/indie-music/reviews/mixposure/comment-page-1/#comment-32300</link>
		<dc:creator>musiclover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 04:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/?p=888#comment-32300</guid>
		<description>Had a terrible experience with one of the new owners/admins of the Mixposure site. Complete moron would be putting it lightly. Please spare yourself from her disaster. Eventually, hopefully they will be exposed for the frauds that they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had a terrible experience with one of the new owners/admins of the Mixposure site. Complete moron would be putting it lightly. Please spare yourself from her disaster. Eventually, hopefully they will be exposed for the frauds that they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/indie-music/reviews/mixposure/comment-page-1/#comment-32286</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/?p=888#comment-32286</guid>
		<description>The owner/admin of Mixposure &quot;Wildcherry&quot; a.k.a. &quot;Wildcherry7777&quot; a.k.a. &quot;Cupcake77&quot; is a complete airhead. She trolls and starts flame wars at the city-data.com forums whining about how awful she&#039;s got it in her brand new mansion outside of Dallas, and how terrible she has it having to put up with living in Texas. I hadn&#039;t even heard of Mixposure.com until she flaunted it all over her profile on other sites. I was thinking, &quot;how could this whiny airhead have such another site?&quot; Thanks Heather, now I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The owner/admin of Mixposure &#8220;Wildcherry&#8221; a.k.a. &#8220;Wildcherry7777&#8243; a.k.a. &#8220;Cupcake77&#8243; is a complete airhead. She trolls and starts flame wars at the city-data.com forums whining about how awful she&#8217;s got it in her brand new mansion outside of Dallas, and how terrible she has it having to put up with living in Texas. I hadn&#8217;t even heard of Mixposure.com until she flaunted it all over her profile on other sites. I was thinking, &#8220;how could this whiny airhead have such another site?&#8221; Thanks Heather, now I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/indie-music/reviews/mixposure/comment-page-1/#comment-31769</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 23:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/?p=888#comment-31769</guid>
		<description>The new mixposure is a blatant act of piracy by someone who commandeered the domain site in a moment of vulnerability.  The new engineer of Mixposure is a fraud and has nothing to do with the brilliance and ingenuity of the original Mixposure built from the ground up by one person - who is trying to get the domain back.  Apparently the new guy is to pleased with capitalizing on someone elses ideas to do the right thing and place it in the capable hands of the one whose baby it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new mixposure is a blatant act of piracy by someone who commandeered the domain site in a moment of vulnerability.  The new engineer of Mixposure is a fraud and has nothing to do with the brilliance and ingenuity of the original Mixposure built from the ground up by one person &#8211; who is trying to get the domain back.  Apparently the new guy is to pleased with capitalizing on someone elses ideas to do the right thing and place it in the capable hands of the one whose baby it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

