<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Silverstein</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indieupdate.com/indie-music/reviews/silverstein/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/indie-music/reviews/silverstein/</link>
	<description>Indie Music Blog - Independent Music News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 05:22:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fardreamer</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/indie-music/reviews/silverstein/comment-page-1/#comment-28929</link>
		<dc:creator>Fardreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/independent-music/silverstein/#comment-28929</guid>
		<description>Familiarity, I think, is what makes us gravitate to certain bands. For instance, Oasis fans swear that that band has a Beatles-like quality even though the bands are a generation apart timewise.  The content might be different, but the sound is the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Familiarity, I think, is what makes us gravitate to certain bands. For instance, Oasis fans swear that that band has a Beatles-like quality even though the bands are a generation apart timewise.  The content might be different, but the sound is the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jewel</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/indie-music/reviews/silverstein/comment-page-1/#comment-28925</link>
		<dc:creator>Jewel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/independent-music/silverstein/#comment-28925</guid>
		<description>I do not think that&#039;s exactly true. A lot of people like this band, at least here, and they seem pretty mainstream to me. Yes they are similar to other bands, but that&#039;s why a lot of people would like them. People are always looking for something similar to what they already listen to, because that&#039;s what they are used to. This band is alright, but not something I listen to a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think that&#8217;s exactly true. A lot of people like this band, at least here, and they seem pretty mainstream to me. Yes they are similar to other bands, but that&#8217;s why a lot of people would like them. People are always looking for something similar to what they already listen to, because that&#8217;s what they are used to. This band is alright, but not something I listen to a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gilipsie</title>
		<link>http://www.indieupdate.com/indie-music/reviews/silverstein/comment-page-1/#comment-28556</link>
		<dc:creator>gilipsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 21:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieupdate.com/independent-music/silverstein/#comment-28556</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if the mainstream would even grip to them. Because they are reminders of many other groups out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if the mainstream would even grip to them. Because they are reminders of many other groups out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

